 |
 |
 |
| « May 2012 » | | | | | | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Currently Online:
Members: 10
Robots: 1
Guests: 22
Total: 33
Last 24 Hours:
Users: 20
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Articles: |
| This Hour:
0
|
| Today:
0
|
| This Month:
21
|
| All Time:
1794
|
| Membership: |
| Registered Today :1945 |
| This Hour:77 |
| This Month:45930 |
| Total:234658 |
| Banned:0 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
HOT INVESTORS DISCUSSIONS |
 |
Forum |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Avoid Tapping Your Nest Egg in a Down Year |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
| author: gdz | 17 August 2007 | Views: 310 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
ONE OF THE MOST important investment decisions you will ever make is not whether to retire but when you chose to do it. Every American looks forward to the day when they can trade the 9-to-5 grind for a little bit of well-deserved rest and relaxation. But the easiest way to erase decades of smart saving - picking the right funds, contributing the right amounts - is to start taking big withdrawals at the wrong time, especially if the stock market is in the midst of a prolonged slump.
By tapping an account during a down period, investors run the risk of eating into years of valuable retirement income that they may never be able to regain. They may have the money today but as the typical American starts to live well into their 80s they may not have that money down the road. This is particularly important now, as many market experts think that despite record highs in the stock market we will soon see a correction. Luckily, there are some easy steps you can take, like getting a handle on what financial pros call your investment horizon, to help you insulate yourself from this problem well in advance of it happening.
And what a problem it is. Moshe Milevsky, an associate professor of finance at York University, recently presented a retirement conference audience with two identical $100,000 portfolios whose owners, he said, would remove $9,000 from their balances every year. Despite having similar average annual returns and standard deviations over the long haul, one portfolio started with a three-year average return of -5.6% while the other enjoyed a 22.1% average annual return during the same time period. After the first three years the portfolios ran through similar market swings.
Milevsky found the first portfolio, the one experiencing negative returns right out of the gate, lasted just 15 years into retirement while the second portfolio still had |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|