 |
 |
 |
Currently Online:
Members: 4
Robots: 3
|
| Yahoo | Googlebot | | Baidu Spider |
Guests: 5
Total: 12
Last 24 Hours:
Users: 20
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Articles: |
| This Hour:
0
|
| Today:
0
|
| This Month:
35
|
| All Time:
1630
|
| Membership: |
| Registered Today :992 |
| This Hour:28 |
| This Month:25501 |
| Total:89592 |
| Banned:0 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
HOT INVESTORS DISCUSSIONS |
 |
Forum |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Why the Economy Can Withstand $100 Oil |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
| author: gdz | 21 November 2007 | Views: 332 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Forget the credit crunch and mortgage crisis for a moment. What about rising oil prices? So far, the economy has shaken off high prices at the pump, no problemo. But what if oil his $100 or more? Don't fret, says Jim Glassman of JPMorgan:
1) The sticker shock related to $90-$100 oil won't spark new alarms. That's because, for all intents and purposes, consumers already saw $100 per barrel oil this spring, when large numbers of refineries shut down for a long-needed maintenance, gasoline prices spiked above $3.00 per gallon, and retail margins temporarily widened to unprecedented levels.
2) Today's economy is better able to absorb the rise in the relative price of energy, because it is more flexible, it is still relatively strong, and we use energy far more efficiently than we once did so that oil is not as important as it once was. In addition, contrary to popular opinion, oil may be a "tax" initially, for consumers and net oil consuming countries, but eventually oil revenues get spent—recycled—if not in the spending stream, into financial markets.
3) $100 oil implies that [3 trillion] of petroleum dollars are cycling into financial markets annually today, compared with an annual flow of only $600 billion back in 2003 when oil prices were close to $20 per |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
10 Ways to Cut Your Fuel Costs |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
| author: gdz | 21 November 2007 | Views: 395 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
With crude oil futures threatening to hit $90 a barrel, gas prices jumped again this week, to a national average of $2.78 a gallon for regular unleaded, according to AAA. So, fuel economy is paramount. Here are tactics to help you get the most miles per gallon from your vehicle this winter and save money, too.
Get checkups. Regular oil changes and tuneups cost money and can take a big chunk out of your Saturday. But repairing a car that has failed an emissions test will improve its gas mileage by an average of 4 percent. And fixing a serious maintenance problem, such as a faulty oxygen sensor, can improve mileage by as much as 40 percent. Even a simple change like replacing a clogged air filter can improve gas mileage by up to 10 percent.
Inflate tires. Properly inflate your tires according to instructions in your vehicle owner's manual. Underinflated tires can lower gas mileage by 0.4 percent for every pound's drop in pressure of all four tires.
Discover oil. "Get oil changes every three to four months," recommends Ronnie Kweller, spokesperson for the nonprofit Alliance to Save Energy. You can improve your gas mileage by 1 to 2 percent by using your manufacturer's recommended grade of motor oil. But using 10W-30 motor oil in an engine designed to use 5W-30, or 5W-30 in an engine made for 5W-20, can decrease gas mileage by 1 to 2 percent. Also, |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Mayors to Meet About Rising Foreclosures |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
| author: gdz | 21 November 2007 | Views: 486 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
DETROIT (AP) -- This city at the heart of an area that is among the nation's hardest hit by rising foreclosures will host a meeting of mayors from across the country next week to address the nation's housing crisis.
The National Forum on Homeownership Preservation and Foreclosures, organized by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, will includes discussions about the state of the mortgage industry, ways homeowners can avoid foreclosure, and strategies to keep foreclosed properties from dragging down the quality of life in neighborhoods.
"We're not talking about legislation," said Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, who is hosting the one-day forum Tuesday. "We're talking about finding a local solution to a national problem, and we'll start with the conversation here."
The goal is to create policy recommendations to present at a Conference of Mayors meeting in January, Kilpatrick said.
Next week's gathering is closed to the media, but the mayors plan to release a report on the economic ripple effect of foreclosures on U.S. metropolitan areas, with a focus on cities in Arizona, California, |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Six Critical Retirement Missteps |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
| author: gdz | 21 November 2007 | Views: 397 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
When it comes to making crucial decisions about retirement payouts, you don't get do-overs. Instead of checking off boxes and signing forms before rushing off to your retirement party, take time to weigh your options. Making mistakes "can be a very expensive learning curve," says Mark Cortazzo, head of Macro Consulting Group, in Parsippany, N.J. Avoiding them can save you thousands of dollars in taxes.
MISSTEP #1: Withdrawing money too soon
If you tap your retirement funds before age 59 1/2, you'll owe a 10% early-withdrawal penalty on top of the federal and state income taxes you'll pay on each distribution. There are exceptions that let you withdraw your money early without a penalty -- but only if you follow the rules.
For example, if you are at least 55 when you leave your job, you can take distributions from your 401(k) without paying a penalty (but you will still owe income taxes on your withdrawals). The key is to keep your money in your employer's plan when you retire. If you transfer it to an IRA, you'll lose the "55-and-out" option.
Jim Conrad of Huntertown, Ind., planned to tap his 401(k) when he retired last fall after 33 years in the auto industry. But there's a catch: Although you qualify for penalty-free access to your money if you are |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
How to Retire in Tahiti |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
| author: gdz | 21 November 2007 | Views: 259 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
I gave a talk about retirement planning in Los Angeles in 2000. "Melanie," a widow who lost her husband to cancer five years earlier, was at that session and contacted me later to help her with a unique idea: She wanted to move to Tahiti and raise her son there.
Melanie had been a flight attendant for many years and had traveled the globe. "On my first trip to Moorea, French Polynesia, my mouth just dropped as I was struck by the natural beauty of the tropical vegetation and colors of the beach and lagoon; I fell in love with it immediately upon arrival and the Tahitians were exceptional, too. I went home to L.A. but became 'homesick' for Moorea. I flew back, two weeks later, with my only son Josh, who's 7 years old--he liked it, too. On my third trip, two months later, I made my decision to live there. And seven months later, I made that happen."
Caution: Do Your Research First!
Some of you may be thinking of retiring somewhere other than where you live now. When you are considering an exotic location like Tahiti or Mexico, it is especially important to do some homework first so you know what you're getting yourself into.
Melanie had the right idea when she spent time visiting the area where she wanted to relocate. She also |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
How to Retire Without Pinching Pennies |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
| author: gdz | 21 November 2007 | Views: 379 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Question: I'm 59 years old, earn $125,000 a year and plan on working until I am eligible for full Social Security benefits. I have about $1.6 million that's invested in a number of retirement accounts (mostly tax-deferred, but I have a Roth IRA too) and I own an investment property worth about $390,000.
In addition to contributing to my company's retirement savings plan, I also save another $30,000 a year. I would like to retire with the same income I have now without going over a 4 percent withdrawal rate. Is this possible, assuming I invest in a conservative equity portfolio that earns a below average return? - Jim, Saute Ste. Marie, Mich.
Answer: I never like to say that something is a totally done deal. After all, we are going through a shaky period in the economy and the markets, and a lot can happen between now and the time you retire.
Based on the information you've given me, however, it seems you've got a very good shot at achieving your goal, although I do wonder whether you'll need the same income you have now in order to enjoy retirement.
But more on that point later. Let's do a few off-the-cuff calculations to see where you stand.
You say you invest in a conservative equity portfolio that earns a below-average return. Well, I don't |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|